An Obstacle to Recovery is Hope
I recently heard this statement on a television talk show: “One obstacle to recovery is hope.” They went on to discuss how hope plays a part in people recovering from tragedies or moving forward in their lives. In the real world, hope is often helpful in the recovery process. You have hope that things will get better. In other cases, it’s a detriment. Such as when you have the hope that your abuser will change, despite years of abuse. In Mary Kay, hope is a detriment and an obstacle to your recovery.
An article by Raisinberry was about this very issue. Mary Kay lives and dies by hope. So long as you have the “hope” that you might be one of the big winners in the pyramid scheme, you will continue to pour time and money into this losing proposition.
Here’s the truth: A long time ago, Mary Kay admitted in a letter to the FTC that the company recruited 40,000 new U.S. consultants per month. That was 480,000 women recruited each year at a time when MK was reporting about 700,000 consultants on the books. (i.e. huge turnover each year) Being generous, I estimate about 500,000 consultants in the U.S. currently, so recruiting has dropped accordingly. We can estimate that about 28,500 women are still being recruited each month. Yikes!
I’ll be generous and say that Mary Kay has had about 500 women in the U.S. making an “executive income” through Mary Kay over the last 5 years or so. I’m including national sales directors and those very top level sales directors (most likely those doing $750,000 a year or more).
Here are your odds…
500,000 consultants on the books + 1,710,000 new recruits = 2,210,000 women in MK over the last 5 years
Of 2.2 million women in the U.S. who have tried being a Mary Kay consultant over the last 5 years, only 500 have actually achieved an executive income. Your odds are .02%, which is two one-hundredths of one percent.
Oh sure, we’ve got to take into account all those women who never wanted to make a career out of Mary Kay, all those “personal use” recruits signed up by women finishing directorship, and those lazy losers who didn’t try.
Even still, do you like those odds? Do you want to spend hundreds of hours of your family’s time and thousands of dollars of your family’s money trying to achieve that?
I guess so long as that hope is alive, Mary Kay will continue to recruit new women into their pyramid scheme. Everyone is counting on the “hope” that they will be one of those very, very few who make it to the top. It’s time to get real and admit that you have almost no chance of achieving the Mary Kay dream.





Visit the
Well said. And the second half of this is the necessity that so many must lose money for those 500 to have executive income.
Research for the FTC show that 99.6% of MLM participants lose money. The remaining 0.4% don’t lose money. But as this post points out, only 5% of that 0.4% are making any real money. The rest are simply not losing money or hardly making a decent hourly equivalent.
If you look at lifetime participation (which will account for the cumulative churn of participants over the years), the success numbers get even smaller…much smaller. The numbers presented in these analyses are typically for current participants.
High churn rates paired with front-loading is the name of the game in every MLM, especially Mary Kay. The biggest order for most IBCs is the first one. The biggest haul from most participants comes in their first (and likely only) year of participation. Once a rep goes “stale” and stops ordering, it’s time to replace them.
Lets face it…new recruits are just cogs in the MLM wheel, exploited specifically for that up-front spend. Once they stop ordering, who in their upline really cares about them?
In all of Leah Lauchlan’s istories or recruiting videos, she said she started MK to prove it didn’t work. I’d love the truth behind that. The actual truth. How did Pam Shaw help that and did her success line up with a promotion? Or maybe she’s that .02 exception.
Also, if someone has nothing better to do, I’ve always wanted to see numbers that showed everyone coming in to MK being successful. Because I don’t believe there are enough humans alive to support that. Maybe a job for Data Junkie or any of you lovelies that are smart with numbers.
The simple model linked below shows why your intuition is right. It is impossible in these pay-to-play endless-chain recruiting schemes for them to be profitable as a whole. The most damning number is “1”, which is the mathematical limit to the average number of direct downline reps per rep in these schemes. If one person has 5 directs, another 5 participants must have zero. There is simply no way around this.
Its nerdy, but stick with it. It exposes this very simple but fundental limitation of these schemes.
https://www.reddit.com/r/antiMLM/s/zoXh1qSRow
Just dropping in Mary Kay’s 2024 Canadian Income Disclosure Statement.
https://imgur.com/a/mary-kay-canadian-income-disclosure-2024-hPNN90o