The “Final Squeeze”: A Desperate Play by an Nsd Before the Affiliate Rollout

Note: This submission is about one of Mary Kay’s international markets, which cannot be named. Even without knowing the area of the world, however, the situation is interesting and relevant, and not much different than what we see in the United States.

To Pink Truth,

Wishing a peaceful New Year 2026 to everyone here. I am writing today because my heart breaks for the women who are starting this year in financial distress. While their national sales directors are celebrating “new beginnings” with the new My Shop (i.e. the likely start toward launching an affiliate model), the beauty consultants are left picking up the pieces of a manipulative 2025 recruitment drive that was never designed for their success.

I am writing this out of a sense of deep frustration and moral outrage. With the likely affiliate model rollout, I’ve been watching an nsd execute what can only be described as a predatory “final harvest” of her downline.

The Sudden Shift in Energy

Two years ago, this nsd was quiet. There were no contests, no big pushes. But as the affiliate rollout approaches, the “excitement” has been suddenly manufactured. Since early 2025, she has been relentless:

  • Constant Contests: Offering cheap trinkets or the “honor” of a coffee date as prizes.
  • Budget “Luxury” Trips: Promoting domestic and overseas trips to low-cost destinations that most consultants could afford on their own, yet framing them as exclusive rewards for high production.
  • The “Batch” Factory: She has been amping up “Red Jacket Graduations” in rapid-fire batches. Batch 2 “graduated” in September 2025, and Batch 3 is already being pushed through the pipeline.

The Strategy: Extract and Exit

I know why this national sales director does this. She has to extract as much as she can from her downline while the old rules still apply. She is manipulating them into purchasing inventory which they will never be able to sell, especially because the new My Shop process moves Mary Kay toward a direct-to-customer shipping system that doesn’t require consultants to hold personal stock. She was loading them up with “dead” inventory just weeks before the company made that very inventory unnecessary for business.

The Human Cost

The fallout is devastating to watch:

The Struggle: The Batch 2 graduates are already drowning. To cope, they are “self-soothing” with Mary Kay rah-rah and, most heartbreakingly, using their faith to find strength. They are praying for relief from a financial distress that was manufactured by the very woman they call their “mentor.”

The Disappearing Act: The batches that came before have vanished. The usual Facebook adulation has gone silent because those women have been chewed up and spat out.

The sheer cruelty of this nsd is nauseating. Watching her use spiritual language to mask financial exploitation is a betrayal of the highest order.

I am upset, I am disgusted, and I want others to see this pattern for what it is: a desperate grab before the doors close on the old way of doing business. After all, she has a mortgage and bills to pay for all that successful facade she curated to ensnare others. The trapped who traps… the tragic irony of Mary Kay.

That’s it for now.

Have a very, very good new year, Tracy. I wish you all the best in all aspects of life.

4 COMMENTS

  1. “The trapped who traps… the tragic irony of Mary Kay.”

    Tragedy indeed. I have compassion for those who don’t know better. But even many “in the know” are still victims of this inherently exploitative system. Its difficult to wish well for those knowingly perpetuating the carnage, even though they too are getting destroyed.

    It would be so much better if these pay-to-play endless-chain recruiting schemes were outlawed. Until that time, all we can do is shine a light on it, and hope that over time people will recognize and steer clear of this madness known as MLM, idealy eliminating the pool of potential recruits so these systems finally whither on the vine and drift into obscurity.

  2. Thanks for this. Hopefully it will open a few eyeballs for consultants who are being similarly exploited by their director or national. If you’re being hustled through DIQ and/or encouraged to load up on inventory, especially large quantities of the same item (a sure sign it’s about to be discontinued), stop and think about who it will benefit. Hint: not you. That’s always been the rule, but as MK comes closer to some kind of paradigm shift it’s more important than ever.

    “After all, she has a mortgage and bills to pay for all that successful facade she curated to ensnare others.”

    Another very important point. With very few exceptions, NSDs aren’t making anything like the kind of money they want you to think they are, especially now with corporate cutting back on perks. When the change comes, they won’t even have that. I don’t feel a bit sorry for them, just for the people they exploited along the way to build their house of cards on a slippery table.

  3. I’m definitely seeing the desperation starting. Many top directors are churning and burning NOW more than I’ve ever seen.
    Having inventory is absolutely unnecessary now. They know that but won’t VOICE THAT, so they are trying to see how many they can get into the system, get into their heads, so maybe, just maybe, they’ll stick around.
    It’s sad and honestly disgusting to watch.

  4. Could you imagine the uproar if directors were required to disclose how much commission they’d be earning on an initial inventory order?

Leave a Reply to Parsonsgreen Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts