Kristin Sharpe and Brittani Jenks: Not in Good Standing

When Mary Kay’s legal department starts investigating you, it’s time to sit up and take notice. Since Mary Kay Inc. only has the best interests of the consultants and directors at heart, we should take these investigations seriously. Unless you are national sales directors Kristin Sharpe and Brittani Jenks. Then maybe you just do whatever you want and you tell corporate to mind their own business.

A friend of Pink Truth has told me that Kristin and Brittani are both currently under investigation by the MK legal department because of the paid events they have been hosting. When an investigation of an nsd is opened like this, it puts the nsd “not in good standing” with the company.

Here’s what I’ve been told about the situation. Of course, I have no way of verifying this unless Kristin, Brittani, or Ryan Rogers want to talk to me about it. I’d LOVE to talk to any of them, so a phone call would be welcome. It is always my goal to publish factual information. But consider this carefully because I cannot verify the truth and accuracy of it.

Allegedly… Kristin and Brittani have been having events for directors and consultants. These are paid events. Spring Fling and Giftology were very successful. Giftology was only a $12 or $15 “contribution,” which isn’t much, but the money is made on getting huge volumes of women to sign up. They literally had thousands of women sign up, and while they were telling people that they had $20k of prizes, it was more like a few thousand dollars, and the difference was profit.

The most recent event was a “Power Up” day before Leadership Conference. The official story was that 300 women registered, but the materials bought for the event suggested the number was higher.

These paid events are a sticky topic for Mary Kay. Part of the job of an nsd and what she’s being paid commissions for is working with the sales force. So if an nsd having events for consultants and directors and charging them money for it, she’s possibly double dipping. Mary Kay does allow fees to be charged for events if the fees are only enough to cover the costs, and not line the pockets of the national sales director.

But here’s the problem for Kristin and Brittani. According to an old version of the nsd contract that we have:

As the commission compensation payable and other rights granted hereunder to NSD are based upon NSD’s agreement to use NSD’s best efforts to promote the sale of Company’s products, NSD agrees not to promote, distribute or sell to other members of the Mary Kay sales organization, without Company’s prior written approval, any products or services which are not produced, sold or endorsed in writing by the Company.

Now you’re wondering how some nsds get to have their paid events or sell their special notebooks or training materials. That’s because they get permission ahead of time to do so. I don’t know what criteria the company uses when evaluating these things and deciding who gets to do it and who does not.

But allegedly, Kristin and Brittani went rogue. They put on these paid events, and when Mary Kay called them out, there became a mad dash to spend all the money from the events to prove to MK that there were “no profits.” This became a little complicated because they were said to be profiting $20k and up per event, if one does the math on the ticket prices and number of attendees.

Then Mary Kay asks to see receipts for what the money was spent on, because they’re not supposed to turn a profit from the events, and now there’s a real problem. Registration fees were sent to Kristin, so who knows how much Brittani knew about the money that was being collected.

Kristin and Brittany supposedly defended themselves by telling the company that other national sales directors are having paid events and making a lot more money than them. So there!

There have been a few nsds who were terminated for things like this in the past, so the situation is serious. Word on the street is that Kristin is not having this! Do you know who she is? And who her mother is? And what they’ve done for this company? In Kristin’s directors meeting next week, she’s going to tell everyone that Mary Kay Inc. is harassing her for no reason and that everyone should call the company and advocate for her.

I don’t know exactly what “not in good standing” means for a national sales director in Mary Kay, but this is allegedly the status that has been assigned to Kristin and Brittani.

Buckle up, kids. Between the not-so-subtle move toward an affiliate model of business, the high number of nsds retiring, and financial distress at the corporate level…. things are not running smoothly for Mary Kay.

Tagged:

32 COMMENTS

  1. This is rich. xSDs are not allowed to host money-making events. Ahem..what about Seminar? If you do the math there, MKC is most certainly making a non-trivial amount of money off attendee fees. Sure, most of it goes to cover Seminar costs, and some of that goes to cover NSDs attendance costs and speaking fees, but you can be quite sure MKC will never, ever do anything that “costs” them money. Rather, everything MKC does is ultimately paid for by the sales force. This philosophy is sown right into the MK fabric.

    At the end of the day, these NSDs are just doing things the MKC way! How dare they! If anyone is going to bilk the downline, it better be MKC an no one else!

    16
  2. Oooooooooohhhhh… a couple of NSDs, the saints who sit at the right hand of Mary Kay Herself, the MK Royalty, the sugar-sharp Girlboss Babe SHE-eos, the Muppet-mouthed mavens of MK mojo, the capstone of the completely not a pyramid, (allegedly) up to financial hanky-panky?

    This is delectable!

    16
  3. OMG!!!! What a great post.Thank you to the tipster who sent this in. I wonder how many consultants who go to other events will see this post and question what their NSD’s are doing!

    13
    • I don’t think consultants will question it. She’s giving of her time for only $15!!!! They think this is great and a bargain and so it’s fine.

      13
  4. I wonder what Kristin’s mommy, Connie Kittson, thinks of all of this. Surely, she will step in and save her daughter from the embarrassment of possibly being terminated. The whole mother-daughter nepotism in Mary Kay is sickening and so unfair. But, that’s a different topic for another day.

    13
  5. Word on the street is that Kristin is not having this! Do you know who she is? And who her mother is? And what they’ve done for this company? In Kristin’s directors meeting next week, she’s going to tell everyone that Mary Kay Inc. is harassing her for no reason and that everyone should call the company and advocate for her.

    Mary Kay Corp does not care who Kristin is or her mother or anyone on her team. If legal is really this far into an investigation, then both Ms. Sharpe and Ms. Jenks are not looking at a future in the company. Plus the money that will head back into MKC with two less NSDs and their downlines shuffled back into the National Area.

    15
    • Kristin’s fatal mistake is going to be thinking that MK cares about them. MK would be very glad to have them gone and no more commissions. What are the odds that this whole thing ends in a termination and someone suing MK? Yes please! Put all the documents out there!

      17
  6. Someone on the messageboard posted what I thought was a very astute observation: what with Ryan suing and being sued, he’s probably doing everything he can to ensure that MKC looks like a rule following, well-run, totally not pyramid-schemey business. Because if, during discovery, anyone looks too closely and decides that he is running a pyramid scheme, he’d be in big trouble.

    And there ain’t no one he wouldn’t throw under the bus to save his own hide.

    19
    • Also, unlike a certain other major MLM, he doesn’t have the financial muscle to pay off officials or get officials into office that will look the other way or install judges that will interpret the law in his favor. MLMs have ridden on the coattails of this major MLM for decades but that only goes so far.

  7. If Kristen is told to leave, she can always become a coach like her auntie in HI. Probably make more money at that too. We’ll see.

  8. If MK is cracking down on consultants for being naughty, do you think they’ll have some conversations with Taylor Bero?

    It looks like she set up her own personal shopping site to sell her own already-purchased Mary Kay inventory online. Allegedly.

    https://taylorvanis13.wixsite.com/marykay/shop-1

    And then there’s this. It looks like she’s or “a friend” is selling their own products with Mary Kay logos on them. Allegedly. Did they get permission from MK to do this? A Mary Kay brand ambassador kit for $99, the $30 MK planner, the Queens Court of Sales tracking sheets, a Mary Kay drink coozie for $6. While the $35 pink Cadillac pajama pants and $35 pink Cadillac blanket don’t say Mary Kay on them, would the distinctive Cadillacs be enough of a trademark infringement?

    https://www.virtualbestiemk.com/holiday

    Perhaps all of this wouldn’t be on Ryan’s radar as, while it may violate TOS and possibly be trademark infringement, it wouldn’t raise pyramid scheme red flags in a lawsuit.

    • At one point Taylor had a different website called Gracefully Shae where she sold merchandise and templates like she does on virtual bestie. The who is setup had her name and address too. Once VB showed up, they made sure to make the owner name and address private.

    • I don’t think that setting up your own website is prohibited, as long as it’s clear that it’s a personal thing and you don’t use any copyrighted material like photos owned by MK.

      Probably selling something with MK logos is not okay. Probably selling something w/ a pink Cadillac is okay because MK doesn’t own Cadillac and doesn’t have a lock on the color pink. Although, if they wanted to be the bully with the deep pockets, they could be.

    • From the sales director agreement:

      “8.6 For so long as Sales Director is authorized to use the name “MARY KAY” in connection with the sale of any products under the terms of this Agreement, Sales Director agrees not to promote, distribute or sell to other members of the Mary Kay sales organization, without Company’s prior written approval, any products or services which are not produced, sold or endorsed in writing by the Company. Sales Director further agrees not to promote, distribute or sell to anyone any products which are not produced, sold and/or distributed by the Company in a manner which would falsely designate or suggest, or would be likely to suggest or indicate such products as originating with, or endorsed by the Company.”

      So even if the website selling MK branded merch that wasn’t produced by MK was set up by “a friend,” that she’s even promoting it is a violation.

      Naughty, naughty.

  9. What is the MK relationship between Kristin and Brittani? Kristin is not Brittani’s upline, correct? Yet, they certainly seem to pair up a lot. Did Kristin “mentor” Brittani in her NSD pursuit?

  10. With the obvious move toward the affiliate model, would it not benefit MK Corp to get rid of as many NSDs as possible? Maybe that would help explain this ALLEGED crackdown. I’m not as well versed in the MK scam as many here are, but that’s the thought that jumped into my head.

Leave a Reply to Chanteuse Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts