Mary Kay Directors Use Their Children as Recruiting Props

Written by Tracy and Parsons Green

In the world of Mary Kay, image is everything. Whether it’s a carefully curated Instagram feed full of product shots or a family portrait snapped in front of a not-so-free Cadillac, sales directors know the power of perception. And nothing says “I’m living the dream” quite like happy kids beaming next to mom as she holds the keys to her newest pink prize.

You often hear how someone’s child is “the reason” they’re doing Mary Kay. They say to use your family as a reason, not an excuse. (i.e. Don’t skip MK things to go to family events. Tell your family that you are doing MK for them and that’s why you have to be at the MK event.)

But let’s get real. These images aren’t just sweet family moments. They’re marketing tool… strategically shared to sell the idea that Mary Kay is a “family-friendly” business where success is just a few parties away. And the kids? They’re bait. Unwitting props in a recruitment scheme dressed up as empowerment.

“Look what mommy earned!”

Perhaps the most obvious use of children in Mary Kay propaganda is during car pickup. The photo op is obvious and easy.  The proud sales director stands center stage, clutching her keys and smiling wide in front of the car she “earned.” (More likely her credit card got a big workout to finish the production needed, but shhhhhhhh… we’re not supposed to talk about that.) But the director is rarely alone. Her husband and kids are there too, dressed to match, grinning for the camera.

These images flood social media, accompanied by captions like:

  • When you work hard, your family wins too.
  • My kids get to see what success looks like.
  • I’m doing this for them!

Except we know better. That car? It’s not a gift. It’s leased in the director’s name. She’s on the hook for production requirements every quarter  just to keep the keys. And often, that results in directors “topping off” production at the end of a quarter to make sure they don’t miss the mark. And if they do miss it, then they get to make a payment to MK each month toward the lease. (That’s how the car ends up being NOT free for so many directors.)

 

The pictures with the family aren’t about the family winning. This is about creating a photo-friendly moment that reinforces the fantasy of “free cars” and “family friendly” and “anyone can succeed.” The director’s followers aren’t supposed to think about the pressure, the returns, or the chargebacks. They’re just supposed to be wowed by the smiley kids and the shiny Cadillac.

The Seminar Sideshow

Another favorite backdrop for child-as-prop marketing is Mary Kay seminar. These annual conventions are touted as the ultimate celebration of success, complete with awards, recognition, and a whole lot of pink sparkle. It’s common to see photos of children attending with their mothers, all dressed up, and sometimes with matching outfits or holding signs cheering on mom.

Sure, this is cute. The kids don’t know any better. But the truth is that all of this is less about celebrating family and more about selling a vision. “See how you can do this too? You don’t have to choose between your kids and a career.” That’s the message.

Behind the scenes we have:  Hours spent away from home doing meetings, parties, facials, chasing production, recruiting. Missed bedtimes. Missed weekends. And let’s not forget the financial losses that pile up from ordering inventory you didn’t need just to maintain status. This “business” doesn’t give you more time with your family, it takes it. And then you’re expected to use those kids to cover up the truth and help sell the fake dream to others.

Parties, Prizes, and Preschoolers

Even at smaller unit events or parties, it’s not uncommon to see consultants bring their children along. Sometimes they’re helping set up product displays. Sometimes they’re modeling as a “future Mary Kay girl.” Sometimes they’re just sitting in the corner with an iPad, waiting for the meeting to be over. Sometimes they’re on camera during a virtual event.

We’ve seen directors post about this proudly: “My daughter gets to see mommy working hard!”

“My son is my biggest cheerleader!”

The implication? Mary Kay lets you do it all….parenting and career, no compromises.

But if your business is so family-friendly, why are you dragging your child to a skincare party on a school night? Why are you holding unit meetings during dinner time? Why are your kids being used as a prop to sell a lie?

The truth is that Mary Kay isn’t about family. It’s about performance. About projecting success even when your credit card is maxed out from ordering another $600 of product you didn’t need. And the kids in those photos? They’re just another layer of that illusion.

Let’s Talk About “Permission”

When these photos (posted publicly on Facebook or Instagram or any other public platform) get re-shared in critical contexts like Pink Truth, the reaction is swift and dramatic.

“How dare you share a picture of my child!”

“This is illegal! You didn’t ask my permission!”

Let’s be clear: Sharing public images in a discussion of public business practices is not illegal. The outrage isn’t really about the kids, it’s about the narrative being challenged. The director wants control over the story. She wants to use her child’s image to recruit and inspire, but the moment someone highlights the manipulation, suddenly it’s crossing a line.

This double standard is exhausting. You can parade your child in front of your unit. Use her in a social media reel about earning your red jacket. Post his picture next to a flyer for your “MK Mommy & Me Makeover Party.” But the moment someone points out how exploitative that is, now it’s a problem?

If you don’t want your children’s images associated with your “business,” maybe don’t use them as marketing tools in the first place. If you think your kid shouldn’t be “all over the internet,” then don’t post your kid on the internet.

Mary Kay wants to sell you a dream, and the dream includes a smiling family that supports you every step of the way. But the reality is often much uglier. Directors lean on their families for emotional and financial support, spend hours away chasing production, and pressure their recruits to do the same….. all while using their children as proof that “this business works.”

It doesn’t. It just looks like it does, especially when a kid is posing for the camera..

27 COMMENTS

  1. Let’s not forget that Mary Kay Wagner Rogers Eckman Weaver Louis Miller Hallenbeck Ash sent her own children to boarding school to keep them out of her way while she was building her fortune, and that official MK events explicitly exclude children. This is not a family friendly company.

    13
    • I did forget about boarding school! MK Ash was really a terrible woman, when you get down to it. She created an absolutely diabolical business model, based entirely on exploiting women by dangling cheap trinkets in front of them to get women to order products they don’t need. The pink Cadillac was never about rewarding anyone. It was about how much production they could extract out of directors in pursuit of this trophy. Everything about seminar and diamonds and trips and everything given as a “reward” or “gift” to consultants and directors was (and still is) very carefully calculated to extract the maximum possible ordering.

      10
      • Hollup.. we need a whole post on this because I’ve never heard this.

        I feel like at one point it was baby friendly, then Laura Beitler put her food down because moms of multiples were taking over seminar and other events. I was able to see the next years seminar dates while at seminar and it fell right around one of my daughters birthday. Someone actually told me that she’d have a lot of birthdays and seminar couldn’t be missed. I would have never forgiven myself.

        These people are relentless.

        • I watch one director, and for the life of me I can’t remember which one, wish her kid a happy birthday from the stage. She was queen that year, so kids were with her. She had a boy and a girl. Spoke to her son, “You’re the most important boy in the world” or some such nonsense. Then completely forgot to say the same about her daughter!

          Seriously, this business is the worst!

  2. Truly successful people don’t need to tell anyone they are successful. As time goes on, fewer and fewer people take at face value what their peers are posting on social media when it comes to lifestyle. If it is forced, it is likely fake, and more often than not creates a cringe reaction.

    MLM peddlers take note: This once abundant fertile ground is fleeting.

    13
  3. I know I bring this up a lot, but the lack of internet savvy among the huns blows my mind sometimes.

    Nothing on the internet is ever truly private, and it never totally disappears. A lot of parents don’t post pictures of their kids online precisely because of that, or they limit it to something like a private Facebook page.

    Don’t use your kids as propaganda tools for your scammy MLM, keep your precious memories to your friends and family, and there’s no problem.

    14
    • I occasionally come across a photo I posted on a hobby website sometime in the early 1990’s. When my children were in school, both elementary and high school, I had to sign releases in order for my children to be pictured on their websites or social media pages.

      But huns like “Christian Influencers” or “Tradwives” are happy to monetise their offspring without any concern. Snark sub-reddits tend to have a “no children’s faces” policies so children are censored even if the parents post them openly.

  4. All great points and we can’t forget about the impact on the “big kids” too. Like the adult daughters of directors and NSDs. I could only imagine the pressure of walking in the footsteps of a parent but adding the layer of it being a business like MK is a whole different ball game. I imagine if they wanted to get out of it, they likely felt like they couldn’t until their moms retired because legacy is such a big story in recruitment scripts. So many people would have questions as to why their own daughters would leave if it was such a great business opportunity. I remember hearing a sales director say that she told her daughter that either she had to join her team and work her business when she turned 18 or she would charge her full price every time for products. Clearly she was hard down to meet a number.

    Also, I’m sure there are some extremely talented young women whose skill sets would better be used elsewhere but they’ve been forced to continue the cycle. I hope they don’t look back and regret keeping themselves confined to an industry and not exploring opportunities elsewhere for the sake of satisfying and helping their moms “careers”.

    12
    • Good points, Lolo! And, remember, even when Mommy retires, daughters aren’t always free. I give you Linda and Katie Toupin.

      12
      • Poor Elizabeth Katie Toupin Candi Jenkins. She mentioned recently on Patreon that every time she travels to a show with a band, she ends up losing about $1000 after paying the band. I’d love to know what share of her unit’s money is going to her and what goes to Linda.

  5. Never ever have I used my children as justification for photos for my J.O.B. I’ve never had a reason to post about them in any context with my job. I keep the two worlds separate. But then I’m not trying to manipulate people by using my family as propaganda for my business.

    I realize lots of real family-owned businesses use children in commercials but we all know that’s what it is. I think the Huns forget that their socials are the equivalent of commercials. This is why Mary Kay tells them to have separate FB and IG accounts.

    12
  6. One thing Kristen never mentions is actually playing *with* her little boy. They’re simply in the same room together. She’s a sweet person, deep down I know that’s not good enough for her. It’s the lie we told ourselves was ok. You can’t have both. I was a miserable mommy while hustling Mary Kay. I missed my babies and was so sad. Thank God He called me out of it all and brought me back home.

    13
    • And Kristen is already posting pics of her girl toddler wearing shirts that say Future NSD. Can’t her son be an NSD if he wanted to be?

      • Yeah there’s a lot we can unpack there. If she didn’t post pics like that, the MK world would be asking why. Peer pressure in the weirdest way. Imagine all the folks taking her pic from fb to share on their fb in hopes to snag any girl mom. Vomit. I remember it though. They will say and post anything to be MK famous and get all the shares. It’s such an invasive company. Just let the people sell the stuff and stop telling all the moms of girls that generational MK is real success. And Luke will def be in MK if it means she can pull a Linda Toupin move.

        • They really can’t win with this. If they post their kids, I’ll say that they’re exploiting the kids to sell their scam. If they don’t post their kids, other scammers will say they’re not doing it right. But that’s what you get with a non-business.

  7. I know someone who swore, “You’ll never see my children’s faces on Facebook!” But when she joined an essential-oil MLM, their faces were in many photos…standing by as mom used the oils in cooking, helping mom use the MLM cleaning products, having mom apply the oil to their boo-boo…

  8. If you don’t want your children’s images associated with your “business,” maybe don’t use them as marketing tools in the first place. If you think your kid shouldn’t be “all over the internet,” then don’t post your kid on the internet.

    Depending on the hosting platform and the number of subscribers, these ladies could be profiting financially from posting their children on-line. At least one state requires that some money “earned” by posting minors should be set aside for them like the Coogan Law for child actors.

    • Woahhhhhhhh. She was the worst. I wish I was here back then because I know yall had some good material with her. She was smart enough to leave though even though she’s still essentially doing the same thing.

  9. Two words: Megan Markle.

    Megan is a PRO at keeping Archie and Lilibet hidden, when she wants them hidden. The children have become props in her “business ventures” and social media, and people are not falling for it. Everything with her planned, scripted, and directed, just like these MLM crazies.

    5
    1

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts