Mary Kay Inc. Only Cares About Wholesale Orders
Written by Frosty Rose
One of the things I was taught as an emerging leader in Mary Kay was to always recognize what you want more of. My director at the time was having trouble with people coming late to the weekly success meeting. So, she started an “on time” drawing. Everyone who showed up on time received a ticket for a prize (gaudy, cheap jewelry or discontinued product) that was drawn at the beginning of the meeting.
It’s solid leadership advice, and it works really well. Miraculously, everyone started showing up on time for that meeting! I’ve seen many directors do this with different things they were recognizing at weekly meetings—sales went up (a little), people showed up on time, everyone came in dress code (ugh), everyone was using more MK products, and they came in a full face of makeup (double ugh).
But what happens when we try to apply this leadership maxim at the corporate level? For years, corporate has wrung its hands and said it simply cannot recognize retail sales to customers. After all, consultants are independent contractors—corporate doesn’t have the right to ask them for sales slips, P & L statements, or any kind of report that would indicate actual sales to real live customers.
This is blatantly false. Can you imagine Uber saying something similar? “Well, we can’t require mileage reporting from our drivers. They’re independent contractors!” Yeah, right.
They’re doing their best, they say, when they recognize the “Queen of Sales.” They use the best measure they have—wholesale orders times two. For those who are not aware consultants purchase their products from Mary Kay Inc at 50% of the retail price. That’s how they come up with the mythical 50% profit margin that consultants enjoy.
The problem with that math, as Pink Truth has repeatedly shown, is that consultants rarely sell products at full retail price. They’re making considerably less on all sales. And all those consultants running half-off sales in June? They’re selling products at their cost (and taking a loss after you factor in shipping and other expenses), simply to achieve recognition at Seminar for “retail” sales. Or, worse, they’re ordering a bunch of product they haven’t even sold and stockpiling it.
I remember the first time I visited one certain former director. I admired her persistence in her business, her refusal to give up despite setbacks. Sure, she’d lost her directorship, but she was still a successful consultant with a profitable sales business. She was always a star consultant and had even earned a “real diamond” ring for selling $36,000 retail in one year.
I was horrified when I saw her garage. There was no room for one car, much less two. Wall-to-wall industrial shelving held boxes upon boxes of Mary Kay product, much of it discontinued, probably more than that expired, all of it stored in a garage that wasn’t climate controlled. More than any consultant would need to sell to an entire town, much less one person’s customer base.
I lost a lot of respect for her that day, after seeing the reality behind how she “earned” those accolades. But I thought, surely, she was a fluke. Over the years, I learned that this was the rule, not the exception. The exception is the consultant who consistently sells and keeps an appropriate level of inventory on hand to fulfill her customers’ orders. Ya’ know, like a real store.
So, why doesn’t Mary Kay corporate crack down on this kind of behavior? Surely, it’s in no one’s best interests to have consultants stockpiling products that will never be sold to a consumer. Consultants are losing money and burning out, and customers aren’t getting to enjoy those “fabulous, high-end” products. Plus, when a consultant sells an old, expired, discontinued product to a customer, it makes the brand look bad—who wants to be associated with old, turning, separating product?
It would be relatively simple to require proof of sales to compete for recognition purposes. Those consultants who only order for themselves or as “hobby” consultants could simply opt out of recognition. But corporate won’t do it. Because they don’t care how much consultants are selling to their customers.
Corporate’s dirty little secret is this: they are doing exactly what they ask directors to do—recognizing what they want more of. In this case, wholesale orders to corporate, regardless of what happens to that product once the consultant receives it. They’re making their money on wholesale orders. It’s up to you as “CEO of your own business” what you do with all that makeup when it’s in your hands. Never mind that they don’t teach you how to be a “CEO.” Never mind that they actively discourage consultants from running an appropriate P & L report (because it’s almost all loss with very little profit). Never mind that they employ the best manipulation tactics on the planet to encourage excess purchasing.
If it were only a few consultants who had garages full of product melting in the hot southern sun, never to be delivered to a paying customer, it would be easier to blame the consultants for their lack of business acumen. But 99% of women who start a Mary Kay “business” will lose money. That number indicates to me, and to most people who stop to think about it, that they are losing money because that’s how the business model is designed, not because of some unfortunate accident that corporate can’t control.





Visit the
I’ll never forget my director asking me how much I was going to order. She needed to know so that she would know how much HER order would need to be to make production! Yes, she actually said that.
She is still listed as a sales director and has been a director for 40+ years even though I know she is no longer recruiting or actively working her business. She hasn’t purchased a Director’s suit in years and no longer attends Seminar. In her more active years she was always in Director’s Queens Court of Sales ( orders). Now she simply waits until the end of each month and supplements her production with her own order. She doesn’t need the income because she is a widow with a nice retirement and no mortgage. I haven’t seen her garage but her Mary Kay closet was jam packed with products she will probably never sell. The fact that she still claims to be a successful Mary Kay Sales Director is actually pathetic.
I saw a consultant selling her MK inventory in Whatnot yesterday. 🤷🏼♀️ I guess it was a great way to move things fast?!
Well stated Frosty. I will add that not only are all the corporate incentives in Mary Kay tied to ordering and recruiting, with no corporate incentives to sell, but in reality, from a corporate perspective, the MK sales folk are the true retail customer! Aside from the aforementioned incentives, the MK “wholesale” price is well above market “retail” for products of similar quality, making the products nearly impossible to sell outside the downline.
If MKC was concerned about retail sales outside the downline, the MK “wholesale” price would be such that the sales folk have room to “mark up” from the wholesale price and still sell at a competitive price while producing a meaningful “margin” for their little business. But alas, as you point out, MKC really does not care what happens to the product once they “sell” it to the downline at grossly inflated prices!
All of this proves that the sales force is duped into thinking they are business owners, when in reality, they are seen by MKC as their primary customer!
CLOSE YOUR MOUTHS, CONFOUND IT! YOU’RE NOT GROUPERS!
“Corporate’s dirty little secret is this: they are doing exactly what they ask directors to do—recognizing what they want more of. In this case, wholesale orders to corporate, regardless of what happens to that product once the consultant receives it. They’re making their money on wholesale orders.” Exactly right, and it’s kept the money flowing uphill for over 60 years, so there’s been no incentive to change anything.
MLMers like to claim that MLM is the same as a franchise, which it isn’t, but let’s pretend it is for a moment. Take something like Subway. You sell some tuna salad every week to a couple of regulars – the consultant’s handful of regular reorders. You sell a bit more during Lent, same as you might score some gift sales over the holidays. Then, a contest comes along: “buy 100 lbs of tuna salad a week during November and be entered into a chance for a drawing for a pack of blue napkins!” Because Corporate scored a deal with some seafood distrubutor and they want to make their money back on it. You think, “what am I going to do with 100 lbs of tuna when I don’t even sell 2 a week? Plus it’s November and people want hot subs.” You post your misgivings on Facebook and the consensus is “Don’t be such a negative ninny, because that just means you want to fail! just think of how happy your tuna salad people will be! They can buy extra sandwiches to take home and eat them for breakfast, lunch, and dinner all week! Plus, you’ll have plenty to hand out samples to everyone! You’ll make so many more new tuna customers!” You order it, all fired up for the challenge. Corporate gets your money! Your supervisor gets her commission!
So a week goes by, and maybe a couple of tuna salad fans are happy, but most just want their usual once a week. People are happy to take samples, because people are mooches, but by the end of the week it’s starting to smell funny, but Monday you’re getting your fresh 100 lbs and your supervisor shares some ideas she tried during the Great Mortadella Sale of 1986. Because without you ordering your own vat of tuna salad, she doesn’t get a commission and has to order two herself.
Next week, your tuna salad lovers are sick of it, no one even wants the samples. No one wants tuna subs even if they’re buy one, get 6 free. They don’t want the tuna, salami, and olive loaf combo special, nor even the Tuna Lover’s Gift Pack including a half sub, a straw, a butterscotch, and a fun tuna fact card even though your packed them in cute little bags with ribbons with little fishies on them.
But you want those napkins, and your supervisor tells you that if you REALLY want them, you’ll find a way even if you have to eat next week’s whole shipment yourself. Which you might have to, because the folks who come in for cheesesteaks and Italian subs have defected to a different shop that’s way accross town and out of their way, and the line’s always kind of long, but they get more meat on their subs for cheaper and no one’s trying to shove spoiled tuna down their throats.
Finally, the last week of the tuna challenge arrives. You post so many picturs of your Thanksgiving dinner, roast tuna salad with tuna gravy, mashed tuna, tuna stuffing, and tuna pie with tunaberry sauce, with your husband and kids bravely smiling because you’re holding their smartphones hostage and threatened to phone in SWAT raids to their jobs and school if they don’t play along. Astonishingly, it doesn’t work (the pictures. The threats work great until one of your kids runs crying to a neighbor and now CPS is involved and your husband has left you.)
So there you are with no family, no customers, 390 pounds of stinking fish. Angry, you email corporate about why the hell they’d encourage people to buy that much tuna salad, and they reply, “you chose to buy it, and as an independent contractor it was up to you to figure out what to do with it. And you can’t return it, because it expires after 5 days and we don’t take back expired merchandise.
Oh, and you won the napkins, but corporate regulations require that all napkins be white with the shop’s logo on them, so you can’t even use them in the shop’s napkin dispensers. Even though, in theory, it’s your shop so you should be able to use blue napkins if you wanted to.
If you’ve made it this far, A) congratulations, and B) thinking “that’s idiotic, no one would fall for a scam like that!” and C) have a heap of MK merch piled up somewhere in your home, what really is the difference between a fridge full of spoiled tuna salad and a closet, room, or garage full of spoiled and unsellable makeup?
I love this! Very clever analogy. Amping up the supply side against marginal demand, to the point of pushing customers away with an overly assertive, tone-deaf, obviously self-serving marketing approach.
This is MLM!
Thanks, DJ!
As usual, analogies with a huge dollop of spicy punch that really hits the spot. I really like it.
As a franchisee who actually does sell tuna sandwiches this is a really great analogy. Because as a franchisee, I choose how much product I want to buy based on PARS (Product Amount Required) and I buy from our supply house, not from the franchisor. And things that aren’t our brand specific, I can actually buy in a pinch from say Sams. 4 gallon jars of Hellman’s mayo? Dr. Pepper syrup (bag in a box) because someone punctured the bag installing it? Yep, I have options. Oh and while I pay a franchisee fee to to the company it’s based on my sales to the public, not how much of that tuna I bought from Sysco.
I think I saw you mention it recently, and that’s probably what gave me the idea. So thanks for letting me steal examples from your life 😉
If your inventory purchasing is based on upline demand instead of customer demand, it’s not a business, it’s a scam.
“Queen of Sales” is such a lie. MK needs to call it what it actually represents- “Queen of Ordering Inventory from Corporate”.
Inventory that isn’t needed and will never sell.
After I quit Mary Kay for good, I used to help people liquidate their inventory on Ebay, so they could at least recoup a small portion of the cost. This was back when the packaging was still hot pink. Most of the inventory I was asked to sell was $5k retail value or higher, per person. (I also had to put a disclaimer on each listing that I was not a consultant etc. as MK tried to come for me once…). Depending on what was in each lot, they would recoup anywhere from 1/4 to 1/3 of their cost. Which they knew upfront and were more than okay with. That’s how desperate (and in debt!) a lot of these women were! It’s heartbreaking, really.
Good for you for helping them at least get something back.